<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases - recent issues</title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1756-1000</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0080-1364</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/375?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/405?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/269?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/191?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/196?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/243?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/257?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Autonomy Corporation Ltd's Patent Application]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Application&mdash;Patentability&mdash;Computer program&mdash;Presentation of informa- tion&mdash;Automatic text analysis in an active window and generation of a list of links related to content and provision of an icon representing a category of such links which, on activation, displayed summary of link's contents&mdash;Application refused&mdash;Appeal to Patents Court&mdash;Guidance in assessing whether claim is to computer program as such&mdash;Appeal dismissed</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patents Court]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Autonomy Corporation Ltd's Patent Application]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>374</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/375?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd v Melea Ltd]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/375?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Entitlement&mdash;Perjured evidence given in earlier entitlement proceedings&mdash;Finding of res judicata&mdash;Appeal to Court of Appeal&mdash;Whether agreement conferred title on appellant as "successor in title" to inventor&mdash;Whether cause of action estoppel or issue estoppel&mdash;Whether Bill of Review procedure still exists&mdash;"Fraud of party" rule&mdash;Whether perjurer a "mere witness"&mdash;Whether his perjury should be regarded as that of party to earlier litigation&mdash;Whether continuing false representation&mdash;Whether continuing false representation by party to litigation</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd v Melea Ltd]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>404</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>375</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/405?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd v Trek 2000 International Ltd]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/405?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Revocation&mdash;Proceedings before Comptroller&mdash;Novelty&mdash;Inventive step&mdash;Insufficiency&mdash;Matter in patent extending beyond that in application&mdash;Amendment&mdash;Revocation ordered&mdash;Appeal to Patents Court&mdash;Construction of claims&mdash;Whether amendments added matter&mdash;Claim construction in appellant's favour in foreign jurisdiction&mdash;Whether issue estoppel&mdash;Whether issue raised timeously&mdash;Whether identity of issues in foreign and current proceedings&mdash;Whether error in exercise of discretion to refuse amendments</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patents Court]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd v Trek 2000 International Ltd]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>435</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>405</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/269?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Societa Esplosivi Industriali SpA v Ordnance Technologies (UK) Ltd]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/269?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Design right&mdash;Infringement&mdash;Multiple Warhead Systems&mdash;Joint venture between claimant and first defendant&mdash;First trial in 2004 finding breach of contract by first defendant&mdash;Design right issues adjourned&mdash;Use of joint venture design as starting point in later projects by first defendant&mdash;Further breaches of contract&mdash;Reproducing by means of design documents&mdash;Whether "for the purpose of enabling articles to be made" a subjective test&mdash;Third defendant sole director and shareholder of first defendant&mdash;Director's liability&mdash;Whether joint tortfeasor</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Societa Esplosivi Industriali SpA v Ordnance Technologies (UK) Ltd]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RxWorks Ltd v Dr Paul Hunter]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Trade mark&mdash;Threats&mdash;Whether justified&mdash;Counterclaim for infringement&mdash;Application by claimant for summary judgment on issue of infringement&mdash;"VET.LOCAL" registered for software&mdash;Use of term "vet.local" as folder or directory name or as a domain name in claimant's software&mdash;Whether use in the course of trade&mdash;Whether necessary for mark to be visible at point of sale&mdash;Meaning of "use in relation to"&mdash;"Trade mark use"&mdash;Whether use affected the function of the trade mark&mdash;Perspicacity of average consumer&mdash;Proper approach to an application for summary judgment</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RxWorks Ltd v Dr Paul Hunter]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>338</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Astron Clinica Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Application&mdash;Patentability&mdash;Computer programs&mdash;Claims to programs on suitable storage media&mdash;Claims refused by UKIPO&mdash;Appeal to Patents Court&mdash;Whether claims to computer programs necessarily excluded from patentability&mdash;Whether where method and apparatus claims allowable, a claim to the computer program was also allowable</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patents Court]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Astron Clinica Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/356?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ukipo - Practice Note]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/4/356?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ukipo - Practice Note]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>356</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>356</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tribunal Practice Notice (TPN 4/2007)]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="J1">This Tribunal Practice Notice updates and supplements Tribunal Practice Notice TPN 2/2000 concerning the award of costs in patent, trade mark and design proceedings before the Comptroller.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tribunal Practice Notice (TPN 4/2007)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>190</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/191?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tribunal Practice Notice (TPN 6/2007)]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/191?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tribunal Practice Notice (TPN 6/2007)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>195</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>191</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/196?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[L'oreal Sa V Bellure Nv]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/196?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Trade mark&mdash;Infringement&mdash;Perfumes&mdash;Device marks of containers and packaging&mdash;Replica "Smell-alike" perfumes&mdash;Some packaging held to infringe&mdash;Use of &lsquo;comparison sheets&rsquo; listing claimants&rsquo; marks and defendants&rsquo; equivalent held to infringe&mdash;Claim in passing off dismissed&mdash;Appeal to Court of Appeal&mdash;Whether use in comparison sheets an infringement&mdash;Questions referred to European Court of Justice&mdash;Meaning of "an unfair advantage" of the reputation of a mark&mdash;Questions referred to European Court of Justice&mdash;Meaning of presenting goods as replicas&mdash;Questions referred to European Court of Justice&mdash;Similarity&mdash;Effect of limitations and disclaimers&mdash;Passing off&mdash;Whether smell of perfume part of goodwill&mdash;Instruments of deception&mdash;Whether tort of unfair competition exists</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[L'oreal Sa V Bellure Nv]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>242</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>196</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/243?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Ltd]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/243?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Invalidity&mdash;Amendment&mdash;Patent held valid and amendments allowable&mdash;Appeal to Court of Appeal&mdash;Appeal restricted to allowability of claims&mdash;Added matter&mdash;Intermediate generalisation&mdash;Whether post-appeal amendment allowable</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vector Corporation v Glatt Air Techniques Ltd]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>243</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/257?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dlp Ltd's Patent]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/3/257?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Infringement&mdash;Comptroller's Opinion patent not infringed&mdash;Appeal to Patents Court&mdash;Whether Patents Court should entertain appeal&mdash;Proper approach to appeal&mdash;Whether Comptroller should appear on appeal</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patents Court]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dlp Ltd's Patent]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>