<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases - current issue</title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1756-1000</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>May 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0080-1364</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/375?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/405?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Autonomy Corporation Ltd's Patent Application]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Application&mdash;Patentability&mdash;Computer program&mdash;Presentation of informa- tion&mdash;Automatic text analysis in an active window and generation of a list of links related to content and provision of an icon representing a category of such links which, on activation, displayed summary of link's contents&mdash;Application refused&mdash;Appeal to Patents Court&mdash;Guidance in assessing whether claim is to computer program as such&mdash;Appeal dismissed</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patents Court]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Autonomy Corporation Ltd's Patent Application]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>374</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/375?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd v Melea Ltd]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/375?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Entitlement&mdash;Perjured evidence given in earlier entitlement proceedings&mdash;Finding of res judicata&mdash;Appeal to Court of Appeal&mdash;Whether agreement conferred title on appellant as "successor in title" to inventor&mdash;Whether cause of action estoppel or issue estoppel&mdash;Whether Bill of Review procedure still exists&mdash;"Fraud of party" rule&mdash;Whether perjurer a "mere witness"&mdash;Whether his perjury should be regarded as that of party to earlier litigation&mdash;Whether continuing false representation&mdash;Whether continuing false representation by party to litigation</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cinpres Gas Injection Ltd v Melea Ltd]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>404</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>375</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/405?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd v Trek 2000 International Ltd]]></title>
<link>http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/125/5/405?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p id="H1">Patent&mdash;Revocation&mdash;Proceedings before Comptroller&mdash;Novelty&mdash;Inventive step&mdash;Insufficiency&mdash;Matter in patent extending beyond that in application&mdash;Amendment&mdash;Revocation ordered&mdash;Appeal to Patents Court&mdash;Construction of claims&mdash;Whether amendments added matter&mdash;Claim construction in appellant's favour in foreign jurisdiction&mdash;Whether issue estoppel&mdash;Whether issue raised timeously&mdash;Whether identity of issues in foreign and current proceedings&mdash;Whether error in exercise of discretion to refuse amendments</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patents Court]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/rpc/rcn014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd v Trek 2000 International Ltd]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>UK Intellectual Property Office</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>125</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>435</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>405</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>