Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2007 124(18):619-629; doi:10.1093/rpc/2007rpc27
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2007] R.P.C. 27

DYSON LTD v REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

Court of Justice of the European Communities (Third Chamber) Case C-321/03

(A.Rosas, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovsky and A.Ó Caoimh, Judges): January 25, 20071

[2007] R.P.C. 27

Trade mark—Application—Transparent bin or collection chamber forming part of external surface of vacuum cleaner—Refusal to register by Registrar of Trade Marks—Appeal to High Court—Applicant having de facto monopoly in bagless vacuum cleaners—Whether possible for mark to acquire distinctiveness where proprietor had de facto monopoly—Referral of questions to European Court—Commission raising question not referred by national court—Whether European Court could rule on Commission's question—Whether subject-matter of application a "sign" and capable of constituting a trade mark.

Key Words: Distinctiveness • EC law • Household appliances • Interpretation • Monopolies • Refusal • Registration • Signs • Trade marks


1 Language of the Case: English. The source of the judgment is the website of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. The electronic version from which this report has been taken is not authentic and is subject to amendment. Paragraph numbers in this judgment are as assigned by the court.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.