| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Crown Copyright
EINSTEIN TRADE MARK
(Geoffrey Hobbs Q.C.): February 28, 20071
[2007] R.P.C. 23
Trade mark—Application for revocation—Non-use—Registered proprietor's evidence of use consisting of witness statement from a sister company—Hearing only on written submissions—Evidence held insufficient to establish consent to use and control by the proprietor—Finding by registrar that registered proprietor should have filed evidence relating to consent—Ground for decision did not form part of applicant's case—Mark revoked—Appeal to The Appointed Person—Application to adduce fresh evidence on appeal—No requirement for evidence to be "internal" to registered proprietor—Hearing officer should have invited registered proprietor to address the point—Fresh evidence allowed—Whether necessary for registered proprietor to exercise control over use by economically linked party—Appeal allowed.
Key Words: Civil evidence Clothes Control EC law Licensees Non-use Revocation Trade marks
1 Paragraph numbers in this judgment are as assigned by the court.