Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2007 124(13-14):509-526; doi:10.1093/rpc/2007rpc21
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2007] R.P.C. 21

LG PHILIPS LCD CO LTD v TATUNG (UK) LTD

Court of Appeal

(Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, L.CJ., Neuberger and Leveson L.JJ.): December 20, 20061

[2006] EWCA Civ 1774; [2007] R.P.C. 21

Patent—Infringement—Counterclaim for revocation—Amendment to claims—Amendments refused—Patent held invalid and not infringed—Appeal to Court of Appeal—Construction of claim—Added matter—Intermediate generalisation—Lack of clarity.

Key Words: Added subject matter • Amendments • Clarity • Display screen equipment • Infringement • Patents • Revocation • Validity

1 Paragraph numbers in this judgment are as assigned by the court.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.