Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2006 123(19):653-656; doi:10.1093/rpc/2006rpc26
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2006] R.P.C. 26

HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC'S PATENT

Court of Appeal

(Rix and Jacob JJ.): February 21, 20061

[2006] EWCA Civ 185; [2006] R.P.C. 26

Patent—Invalidity—Revocation—Appeal to Court of Appeal—Dispute settled prior to hearing of appeal—Whether Court of Appeal required to consider merits of appeal—Whether Court of Appeal should require assistance from Comptroller—Costs of Comptroller's assistance—Desirability of scientific adviser—Costs of adviser—Competition law implications of consensual allowal of appeal.

Key Words: Appeals • Comptroller of Patents Designs and Trade Marks • Patents • Restoration • Scientific advisers • Validity

1 Paragraph numbers in this judgment are as assigned by the court.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.