Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2005 122(19-20):703-711; doi:10.1093/rpc/2005rpc29
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2005] R.P.C. 29

DEGUSSA-HULS SA v THE COMPTROLLER-GENERAL OF PATENTS

Patents Court

(Pumfrey J.): December 16, 20041

[2004] EWHC 3213 (Pat); [2005] R.P.C. 29

Patent—Application—Objection of lack of inventive step—Application refused—Appeal to Patents Court—Proper approach to dealing with objection of lack of inventive step during examination—Collocation.

Key Words: Inventive step • Patents • Prior art • Secondary evidence

1 Paragraph numbers in this judgment are as assigned by the court.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.