Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2004 121(14):515-536; doi:10.1093/rpc/2004rpc25
© 2004 by Crown Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2004] R.P.C. 25

MEZZACORONA TRADE MARK

High Court (Chancery Division)

(Neuberger J.): February 19 and 20 and March 26, 20031

[2004] R.P.C. 25

Trade mark—Application—Opposition—Opposition dismissed by registrar—Appeal to Appointed Person—Reference of appeal to High Court—Application to adduce fresh evidence—Whether appeal a rehearing or a review—"MEZZACORONA" for wines—Mezzocorona a wine-producing region in Italy—Whether registration contrary to Council Regulation 2392/89—Whether application made in bad faith.

Key Words: Appeals • Applications for registration • Appointed persons • Bad faith • Origin marking • Trade marks

1 Paragraph numbers in this judgment are as assigned by the court. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is reported at [2004] R.P.C. 26.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.