Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2004 121(11):414-430; doi:10.1093/rpc/2004rpc21
© 2004 by Crown Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2004] R.P.C. 21

HABERMAN V COMPTROLLER-GENERAL

Patents Court

(Peter Prescott Q.C. sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court): March 5, 20031

[2003] EWHC 430 (Pat), [2004] R.P.C. 21

Patent—Application—Withdrawal of application—Uncertainty as to date of withdrawal—Request for information as to date—Patent Office no longer having record of date—Whether Patent Office under a duty to ascertain such information—Whether jurisdiction to disclose information about withdrawn patent applications.

Key Words: Applications for registration • Information • Patents • Withdrawal

1 Paragraph numbers are as assigned by the court.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.