Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2003 120(5):139-143; doi:10.1093/rpc/2003rpc8
© 2003 by Crown Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2003] R.P.C. 8

ANCARE NEW ZEALAND LTD'S PATENT

Privy Council

Before: LORD STEYN, LORD HOFFMANN, LORD MILLETT, LORD RODGER OF EARLSFERRY, SIR CHRISTOPHER SLADE February 6 and 28, 20021

[2002] UKPC 8; [2003] R.P.C. 8

Patent—Revocation—Lack of inventive step—Essential to have regard to what was happening in the market even if not in accord with scientific opinion.

1 Paragraph numbers in this judgment are as assigned by the court.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.