Skip Navigation

Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases 2002 119(19):774; doi:10.1093/rpc/2002rpc40
© 2002 by Crown Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright

[2002] R.P.C. 40

PATENTS ACT 1977: INTERPRETING SECTION 1(2)

Patent Office Practice Notice

PATENTS ACT 1977: INTERPRETING SECTION 1(2)

[2002] R.P.C. 401

Some of the exclusions from patentability in section 1(2) of the Patents Act, and the case law surrounding it, were considered by the Court of Appeal in Fujitsu Limited's Application [1997] R.P.C. 608. In his judgment in that case, Aldous L.J. stated at page 614, lines 40–46.

1 Paragraph numbers added by the publishers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.